Age differences in the association of body mass index-defined obesity with abdominal aortic calcification

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: In cardiovascular disease, previous studies have suggested young age as one of the reasons to explain the obesity paradox. This study attempts to provide a different opinion on this claim through unexpected findings. Methods: We used a cross-sectional analysis of the US nationally representative data, total of 10,175 participants were recruited in 2013-2014 from NHANES. A total of 947 participants were selected to be included in this study through inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria for statistical analysis of the relationship between obesity and abdominal aortic calcification(AAC). Smooth curve fitting and multivariate regression analyses were conducted to examine the associations of obesity with AAC after adjusting for age, gender and associated variates. Results: Depending on the age of the population, the relationship between obesity and AAC showed the different outcome. Obesity was associated with the lower risk of AAC among individuals older than 52 years of age. According to the difference of adjusted covariates, the AAC scores in the obesity group decreased by 0.92, 0.87, and 1.11 for 52 years old or older individuals. In particular, the risk of AAC was lower for patients with obesity with the following characteristics: male, low LDL, low triglyceride, DM, non-cancer patient, smoking, drinking, vigorous work activity, low annual household income, education of 9 – 11th grades and non-Hispanic white. Conclusions: In US, adults aged 52 years or older, obesity was associated with decreased AAC risk. Older age may be one potential reason for the obesity paradox.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guo, T., Huang, L., Luo, Z., Zheng, H., Shan, S., & Cheng, B. (2024). Age differences in the association of body mass index-defined obesity with abdominal aortic calcification. Frontiers in Endocrinology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1336053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free