Do studies of the nature of cases mislead about the reality of cases? A response to Pattison et al

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article questions whether many are misled by current case studies. Three broad types of style of case study are described. A stark style, based on medical case studies, a fictionalised style in reaction, and a personal statement made in discussion groups by an original protagonist. Only the second type fits Pattison's category. Language remains an important issue, but to be examined as the case is lived in discussion rather than as a potentially reductionist study of the case as a text.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Higgs, R. (1999). Do studies of the nature of cases mislead about the reality of cases? A response to Pattison et al. Journal of Medical Ethics. BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.25.1.47

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free