Computational Thinking—More Than a Variant of Scientific Inquiry!

  • Ulrich Hoppe H
  • Werneburg S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The challenge of introducing Computation Thinking (CT) education to K-12 is how to evaluate learners' CT development. This study used information from previous studies to identify essential components and methods for evaluation. A review of literature from 2010 onwards aimed to identify all studies related to CT evaluation to contribute to the development of appropriate evaluation components and methods for senior primary school education. To facilitate the design of a comprehensive evaluation approach, the CT framework of concepts, practices and perspectives developed by Brennan and Resnick (2012) was adopted in this study. This study has two highlights: (1) problem formulation is proposed to be included as a component of CT practices and (2) CT perspectives are refined to include computational identity and programming empowerment as components. CT concepts could be evaluated by test designs with multiple choice questions to identify students' learning outcomes. CT practices could be evaluated by designing rubrics to rate programming projects and using test designs with task-based questions to identify learners' learning outcomes. Finally, CT perspectives could be measured by designing survey instruments and administrating surveys to learners."

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ulrich Hoppe, H., & Werneburg, S. (2019). Computational Thinking—More Than a Variant of Scientific Inquiry! In Computational Thinking Education (pp. 13–30). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6528-7_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free