Skip to main content
Journal ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn

Neuroethics (2019) 12(1) 107-118
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6
12Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this issue, Elizabeth Shaw and Gulzaar Barn offer a number of replies to my arguments in ‘Criminal Rehabilitation Through Medical Intervention: Moral Liability and the Right to Bodily Integrity’, Journal of Ethics (2014). In this article I respond to some of their criticisms.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Douglas, T. (2019). Nonconsensual Neurocorrectives and Bodily Integrity: a Reply to Shaw and Barn. Neuroethics, 12(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9275-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free