Improved performance of stellarator coil design optimization

8Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Following up on earlier work which demonstrated an improved numerical stellarator coil design optimization performance by the use of stochastic optimization (Lobsien et al.Nucl. Fusion, vol. 58 (10), 2018, 106013), it is demonstrated here that significant further improvements can be made - lower field errors and improved robustness - for a Wendelstein 7-X test case. This is done by increasing the sample size and applying fully three-dimensional perturbations, but most importantly, by changing the design sequence in which the optimization targets are applied: optimization for field error is conducted first, with coil shape penalties only added to the objective function at a later step in the design process. A robust, feasible coil configuration with a local maximum field error of 3.66 % and an average field error of 0.95 % is achieved here, as compared to a maximum local field error of 6.08 % and average field error of 1.56 % found in our earlier work. These new results are compared to those found without stochastic optimization using the FOCUS and ONSET suites. The relationship between local minima in the optimization space and coil shape penalties is also discussed.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lobsien, J. F., Drevlak, M., Kruger, T., Lazerson, S., Zhu, C., & Pedersen, T. S. (2020). Improved performance of stellarator coil design optimization. Journal of Plasma Physics. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377820000227

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free