Multilateralism and East Asian transitions: the English School, diplomacy, and a networking regional order

8Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article traces East Asia’s evolving multilateralisms and role in transitioning East Asia away from “US hub-and-spokes” bilateralism toward a more networked system of security arrangements. Drawing on the English School, it argues for revisiting multilateralism’s diplomatic foundations as a way to direct attention to (1) the practice’s region-specific content and (2) the ways that multilateralism has introduced system-transitioning changes that include system-level dynamics associated with membership, actor hood, and the types of security at stake. The result is a more complex security environment and normative context that calls for more multifaceted responses from all, including the United States and China whose current multilateral diplomacies both draw from and challenge the multilateral norms and practices that have been created. Theoretically, re-attention to multilateralism’s diplomatic foundations also offers the English School an opportunity to make more distinctive contributions to ongoing debates about East Asia’s networking processes and security arrangements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ba, A. D. (2020). Multilateralism and East Asian transitions: the English School, diplomacy, and a networking regional order. International Politics, 57(2), 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-019-00202-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free