Reduced social preferences in autism: Evidence from charitable donations

14Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background People with autism have abnormal preferences, ranging from an apparent lack of preference for social stimuli to unusually strong preferences for restricted sets of highly idiosyncratic stimuli. Yet the profile of preferences across social and nonsocial domains has not been mapped out in detail, and the processes responsible remain poorly understood. Methods To assess preferences across a range of stimuli, we measured real monetary donations to 50 charities spanning categories pertaining to people, mental health, animals, or the environment. We compared the donations made by 16 high-functioning adults with autism to those made by neurotypical controls matched on age, gender and education. We additionally collected ratings of how people evaluated the different charities. Results Compared with controls, high-functioning adults with autism donated less overall and also showed a significantly disproportionate reduction in donations to people charities compared with donations to the other charities. Furthermore, whereas controls discriminated strongly between different people charities, choosing to donate a lot of money to some and very little to others, much less discrimination was seen in the autism group. Ratings that probed how participants constructed their preferences did not differ between groups, except for a difference in the perceived impact of pictures and text information about people charities. Strikingly, there were some charities related to mental health, and autism in particular, to which the autism group donated considerably more than did the controls. Conclusions People with autism were found to have reduced preference and sensitivity towards charities benefiting other people. The findings provide evidence for a domain-specific impairment in social cognition in autism spectrum disorder, and in particular in linking otherwise intact social knowledge to the construction of value signals on which preferences regarding other people are based. © 2012 Lin et al.

Figures

  • Table 1 Summary of demographic and background informati
  • Figure 1 Schematic of the donation task. Participants carried out three the charity in question, then they decided on their donation (one charity a descriptions and pictures through explicit ratings.
  • Figure 3 Normalized mean donations (mean and standard error of the mean), shown for the four charity categories. Donation amounts were divided for each participant by that participant’s mean donation across all charities. This revealed a disproportionately lower amount donated to people charities than to any other category of charity. **P< 0.01.
  • Figure 2 Mean and frequency of donations across all four categories not normalized), for the four charity categories, as well as across all c particular category, means and SEM. Shown is the probability of making an
  • Figure 4 Mean donations to individual charities, rank-ordered by the donations given by each participant group. Charities indicated by colored data points correspond to those where the group with autism spectrum disorders showed particularly large differences in their donations compared with donations from those in the control group. Donations from those with autism spectrum disorders are indicated in solid colors and donations from the control group in fainter colors. Pinelands: Pinelands Preservation Alliance (environmental charity); Canine: Canine Assistants (animal charity); Cancer: National Childhood Cancer Foundation (people charity); Red Cross: American Red Cross (people charity); Autism: Autism Research Institute (mental health charity).
  • Figure 5 Ratings given to the charities. Mean (and SEM) explicit ratings given to the charities, after all donations had been made. See Methods and Appendix 1 for detailed description of the ratings.
  • Figure 6 Ratings broken down by charity category. Participants with autism spectrum disorders gave significantly lower ratings to the impact of the picture and description just for the people charities. *P< 0.05, **P< 0.01.
  • Figure 7 Regressions: group mean regression coefficients. We carried individually for each participant. There were no significant differences betw

References Powered by Scopus

Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders

7392Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach

7099Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism

6212Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Atypical Visual Saliency in Autism Spectrum Disorder Quantified through Model-Based Eye Tracking

278Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Largely typical patterns of resting-state functional connectivity in high-functioning adults with autism

149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Autistic Traits and Prosocial Behaviour in the General Population: Test of the Mediating Effects of Trait Empathy and State Empathic Concern

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lin, A., Tsai, K., Rangel, A., & Adolphs, R. (2012). Reduced social preferences in autism: Evidence from charitable donations. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1866-1955-4-8

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

67%

Researcher 12

20%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 34

64%

Social Sciences 7

13%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

13%

Computer Science 5

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 59

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0