From simple innate biases to complex visual concepts

52Citations
Citations of this article
206Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Early in development, infants learn to solve visual problems that are highly challenging for current computational methods. We present a model that deals with two fundamental problems in which the gap between computational difficulty and infant learning is particularly striking: learning to recognize hands and learning to recognize gaze direction. The model is shown a stream of natural videos and learns without any supervision to detect human hands by appearance and by context, as well as direction of gaze, in complex natural scenes. The algorithm is guided by an empirically motivated innate mechanism - the detection of "mover" events in dynamic images, which are the events of a moving image region causing a stationary region to move or change after contact. Mover events provide an internal teaching signal, which is shown to be more effective than alternative cues and sufficient for the efficient acquisition of hand and gaze representations. The implications go beyond the specific tasks, by showing how domain-specific "proto concepts" can guide the system to acquire meaningful concepts, which are significant to the observer but statistically inconspicuous in the sensory input.

References Powered by Scopus

Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection

30667Citations
18106Readers
Get full text

The Origin of Concepts

1782Citations
710Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

1504Citations
4647Readers
Get full text
436Citations
2299Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ullman, S., Harari, D., & Dorfman, N. (2012, October 30). From simple innate biases to complex visual concepts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207690109

Readers over time

‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2509182736

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 96

60%

Professor / Associate Prof. 30

19%

Researcher 29

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 52

40%

Computer Science 35

27%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26

20%

Neuroscience 18

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0