Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of long-term mortality in African Americans undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

29Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) has been shown to predict long-term mortality in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). African Americans have been shown to have lower mean neutrophil counts compared to whites. The usefulness of the N/L ratio in predicting long-term mortality in African Americans undergoing PCI is unknown. Methods: We evaluated a total of 372 African American patients (327 patientswith lower N/L ratio [<3.5] and 45 patientswith higher N/L ratio [≥3.5]) who underwent PCI during January 2003 to August 2005. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at a median follow-up to 3.6 years. Results: During the median (± SD) follow-up period of 3.6 ± 1 years, there were a total of 48 deaths. The mortality rate was 10.4% in the group with a lower N/L ratio and 31.1% in the group with a higher N/L ratio (unadjusted p<0.001). After adjustment for covariateswith significant impact on mortality, N/L ratio was still a strong and independent predictor of long-term mortality with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-4; p = 0.02). N/L ratio was also found to be a strong and independent predictor of long-term mortality even when analyzed as a categorical variable with 3 groups (HR of 0.39 for lower tertile compared to the upper tertile, 95% CI: 0.19-0.81; p = 0.012) and as a continuous variable (p = 0.002). Conclusion: N/L ratio is a powerful independent predictor of long-term mortality in African Americans undergoing PCI. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poludasu, S., Cavusoglu, E., Khan, W., & Marmur, J. D. (2009). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of long-term mortality in African Americans undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Clinical Cardiology, 32(12). https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.20503

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free