A modified single-armed microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for epididymal obstructive azoospermia: Intraoperative choice and postoperative consideration

11Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and the duration required for the sperm to return to the ejaculate after a modified single-armed 2-suture longitudinal intussusception vasoepididymostomy (SA-LIVE). Methods: From March 2015 to December 2018, 134 patients with epididymal obstruction azoospermia underwent the modified single-armed vasoepididymostomy at Shanghai General Hospital. The outcomes and clinical findings were documented and evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 17 (range: 3-36) months. Results: Patency was assessed by the return of sperm in the ejaculate. The overall patency rate was 55.2%, and the patency rates were 58.9, 40.7, 36.4, and 58.9% for bilateral surgery, unilateral surgery, proximal anastomosis, and distal anastomosis, respectively. The average time to achieve patency was 4.11 ± 2.74 months. In the first 6 months, 87.8% (65/74) patency patients reported sperm in the ejaculate. The overall pregnancy rate was 40.9% (29/66) at the follow-up of 3-36 months, and the natural pregnancy rate was 30.3% (20/66). The natural pregnancy rate was 32.1% post-bilateral surgery and 33.3% for the site of distal anastomosis; surprisingly, it was 0% for the site of proximal anastomosis. Conclusion: Modified SA-LIVE is safe and may achieve favorable patency and pregnancy rates. When double-armed sutures are not accessible, single-armed may be preferable. The expected patency time was within 1 year. Moreover, because of the low natural pregnancy rate for proximal anastomosis, sperm banking is preferred to SA-LIVE.

References Powered by Scopus

Evaluation of the azoospermic patient

489Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Infertility in men: Recent advances and continuing controversies

241Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: An update

184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Evodiamine induces ROS-Dependent cytotoxicity in human gastric cancer cells via TRPV1/Ca<sup>2+</sup> pathway

45Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Vasal vessel-sparing microsurgical single-armed vasoepididymostomy to epididymal obstructive azoospermia: A retrospective control study

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Outcomes of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy using intussusception technique: a systematic review and meta‑analysis

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, N., Li, P., Zhi, E., Yao, C., Yang, C., Zhao, L., … Li, Z. (2020). A modified single-armed microsurgical vasoepididymostomy for epididymal obstructive azoospermia: Intraoperative choice and postoperative consideration. BMC Urology, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00692-5

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘2502468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0