Outcomes among inpatients with cirrhosis and clostridioides difficile infection in the modern era: Results from an analysis of the national inpatient sample

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Patients with cirrhosis are at increased risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). We analyzed outcomes and healthcare utilization in hospitalized cirrhotic patients with CDI. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2016-2017 identified 8245 hospitalized patients with a concurrent diagnosis of cirrhosis and CDI. Our primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were length of stay (LOS), hospitalization charges and costs, shock, sepsis, acute kidney injury (AKI), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and home discharge. Results There was no significant difference in all-cause in-hospital mortality between patients with cirrhosis compared to patients without cirrhosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-1.93; P=0.16). Patients with cirrhosis had a slightly but statistically significantly longer mean LOS (+0.57 days, P=0.001). The adjusted difference in mean hospitalization charges was greater in patients with cirrhosis ($+4094, 95%CI $1080-7108; P=0.008), as was the mean hospitalization cost ($+1349, 95%CI $600-2098; P<0.001). There was no difference in the likelihood of sepsis, ICU admission, or home discharge between the groups. Patients with cirrhosis were significantly less likely to develop AKI (aOR 0.82, 95%CI 0.72-0.93; P=0.003). Conclusions Mortality outcomes associated with CDI have improved over time. Patients with cirrhosis continue to exhibit greater LOS and hospital costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iriana, S., Sharma, S., McDonough, S., Zarate, E. R., & Adler, D. G. (2021). Outcomes among inpatients with cirrhosis and clostridioides difficile infection in the modern era: Results from an analysis of the national inpatient sample. Annals of Gastroenterology, 34(5), 721–727. https://doi.org/10.20524/aog.2021.0646

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free