Potential competing interests: No potential competing interests to declare. I had thoroughly gone through this draft and added corrections, suggestions, and comments. Although limited options are available on this platform to review so, below are few points for authors so that they can understand what I want to communicate. 1. I reviewed the manuscript section wise and line to line so please check each line for corrections as some minor corrections like punctuations might be missed. 2. The text that needs to be omitted was striked and replacement of the omitted text is highlighted in bold. 3. My comments or suggestion are mentioned in between the text starting with Note: and is highlighted in Italics. My overall review about the work is that the work done was appropriate in terms of problem identification, site selection, sampling, analysis and result but still a lot of work is required in terms of language, grammatical errors, statistical analysis, data interpretation, and data visualization. With these improvements the work could be communicated in good journals. Abstract: Background:
CITATION STYLE
George, M. A. (2023). Review of: “Assessment of Quality of drinking water based on the water quality index method in Hawassa Zuria Woreda, Sidama Regional State, Ethiopia.” Qeios. https://doi.org/10.32388/y077tw
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.