Simulation of an optional strategy in the prisoner’s dilemma in spatial and non-spatial environments

7Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents research comparing the effects of different environments on the outcome of an extended Prisoner’s Dilemma, in which agents have the option to abstain from playing the game. We consider three different pure strategies: Cooperation, defection and abstinence. We adopt an evolutionary game theoretic approach and consider two different environments: the first which imposes no spatial constraints and the second in which agents are placed on a lattice grid. We analyse the performance of the three strategies as we vary the loner’s payoff in both structured and unstructured environments. Furthermore we also present the results of simulations which identify scenarios in which cooperative clusters of agents emerge and persist in both environments.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cardinot, M., Gibbons, M., O’Riordan, C., & Griffith, J. (2016). Simulation of an optional strategy in the prisoner’s dilemma in spatial and non-spatial environments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 9825 LNCS, pp. 145–156). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43488-9_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free