Nietzsche’s account of the death of God is usually seen either as a sociological analysis of late modernity or as a philosophical thesis intended to undermine the God of metaphysics and morality. However, these readings overlook a central concern of his discourse on the death of God: that God, metaphysical philosophy, and the religions, as traditionally conceived and enacted, are opposed to life. I argue that Nietzsche’s discourse on the death of God ought to be seen, first, as a description of a cultural landscape that is now open to radical revision. Second, following Pierre Hadot, I show how his deconstruction of this God and his construction of a God of life can be understood as complementary spiritual exercises meant to reshape this landscape by transforming how those who perform them see and relate to the world.
CITATION STYLE
Smick, J. (2013). Nietzsche on the death of god and the god of life. In Models of God and Alternative Ultimate Realities (pp. 709–725). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5219-1_58
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.