Comparison of aspiration versus stent retriever thrombectomy as the preferred strategy for patients with acute terminal internal carotid artery occlusion: A propensity score matching analysis

27Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Purpose: There is no consensus on endovascular treatment for terminal ICA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative safety and efficacy of preferred aspiration thrombectomy and stent retriever thrombectomy for revascularization in patients with isolated terminal ICA occlusion. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with terminal ICA occlusion treated with aspiration thrombectomy or stent retriever thrombectomy in our center, from September 2013 to November 2018. To minimize the case bias, propensity score matching was performed. The primary outcomes were successful reperfusion defined by expanded TICI grades 2b-3 at the end of all endovascular procedures and puncture-to-reperfusion time. Results: A total of 109 consecutive patients with terminal ICA occlusion were divided into the aspiration thrombectomy group (40 patients) and the stent retriever thrombectomy group (69 patients), and 30 patients were included in each group after propensity score matching. The proportion of complete reperfusion was significantly higher in the aspiration thrombectomy group (OR 4.75 [95% CI, 1.10-1.38]; P = .002). The median puncture-to-reperfusion time in the aspiration thrombectomy group was shorter than that in the stent retriever thrombectomy group (38 versus 69 minutes; P = .001). Fewer intracerebral hemorrhage events were recorded in the aspiration thrombectomy group (OR 0.29 [95% CI, 0.09-0.90]; P = .028). No significant differences were observed for good outcomes (OR 1.92 [95% CI, 0.86-4.25]) and mortality (OR 0.84 [95% CI, 0.29-2.44]) at 90 days. Conclusions: For the treatment of terminal ICA occlusion, aspiration thrombectomy was technically superior to stent retriever thrombectomy in the absence of a balloon guide catheter in achieving successful reperfusion with shorter puncture-to-reperfusion time and procedure-related adverse events.

References Powered by Scopus

Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: A meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials

5687Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: The ASTER randomized clinical trial

601Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

First pass effect: A new measure for stroke thrombectomy devices

494Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Systematic review and meta-analysis of current rates of first pass effect by thrombectomy technique and associations with clinical outcomes

54Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Importance of Occlusion Site for Thrombectomy Technique in Stroke: Comparison Between Aspiration and Stent Retriever

22Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clot meniscus sign: An angiographic clue for choosing between stent retriever and contact aspiration in acute basilar artery occlusion

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xing, P. F., Yang, P. F., Li, Z. F., Zhang, L., Shen, H. J., Zhang, Y. X., … Liu, J. M. (2020). Comparison of aspiration versus stent retriever thrombectomy as the preferred strategy for patients with acute terminal internal carotid artery occlusion: A propensity score matching analysis. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 41(3), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6414

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

41%

Researcher 9

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

18%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 15

75%

Neuroscience 2

10%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

10%

Engineering 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0