Severe chronic primary neutropenia in adults: Report on a series of 108 patients

34Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Severe chronic primary neutropenia (CPN) is a rare entity, and long-term outcome and risk factors for infections in severe CPN adults have not been described to date.We report the characteristics and outcomes of 108 severe adult CPN patients enrolled in a multiinstitutional observational study. SevereCPNadultsweremostly female (78%), andmedian age at diagnosis was 28.3 years. Diagnosis was fortuitous in 62% of cases. The median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at diagnosis was 0.4 × 109/L, and median ANC without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) during follow-up was 0.5 × 109/L. Twentythree of 66 (34.8%) evaluable patients had neutrophil autoantibodies, and 6 of 47 (12.8%) a T-cell clone. The presence of neutrophil autoantibodies orT-cell clonewas not associated with any specific clinical or biological characteristics. No death or hematologic malignancies occurred, and 44 severe bacterial infectionswere reported in 27 patients with amedian follow-up of 8.3 years. Fifty patients received G-CSF either sporadically (n = 24) or continuously (n = 26) and responded (96%). Nineteen patients received immunosuppressive therapies: overall response (OR) was 41%, and median duration of response was 3 months. At diagnosis, the only predictive factor for the occurrence of severe bacterial infections was an ANC count below 0.2 × 109/L (OR, 0.76). Severe CPN in adults is characterized by a female predominance and a benign outcome with a low rate of severe bacterial infections and no secondary malignancies. G-CSF is efficient and well tolerated but is not required in a majority of patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Fontbrune, F. S., Moignet, A., Beaupain, B., Suarez, F., Galicier, L., Socié, G., … Lamy, T. (2015). Severe chronic primary neutropenia in adults: Report on a series of 108 patients. Blood, 126(14), 1643–1650. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-03-634493

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free