Segregation ratios within Segregation Distorter lines of Drosophila melanogaster conform to a beta-binomial distribution

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Segregation Distorter (SD) chromosomes are preferentially recovered from SD/SD+ males due to the dysfunction of sperm bearing the SD+ chromosome. The proportion of offspring bearing the SD chromosome is given the symbol k. The nature of the frequency distribution of k was examined by comparing observed k distributions produced by six different SD chromosomes, each with a different mean, with k distributions predicted by two different statistical models. The first model was one where the k of all males with a given SD chromosome were considered to be equal prior to the determination of those gametes which produce viable zygotes. In this model the only source of variation of k would be binomial sampling. The results rigorously demonstrated for the first time that the observed k distributions did not fit the prediction that the only source of variation was binomial sampling. The next model tested was that the prior distribution of segregation ratios conformed to a beta distribution, such that the distribution of k would be a beta-binomial distribution. The predicted distributions of this model did not differ significantly from the observed distributions of k in five of the six cases examined. The sixth case probably failed to fit a beta-binomial distribution due to a major segregating modifier. The demonstration that the prior distribution of segregation ratios of SD lines can generally be approximated with a beta distribution is crucial for the biometrical analysis of segregation distortion. © 1990, Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharp, C. B., & Hilliker, A. J. (1990). Segregation ratios within Segregation Distorter lines of Drosophila melanogaster conform to a beta-binomial distribution. Genetical Research, 55(3), 165–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016672300025489

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free