In the final analysis, who is “problematic”? An integrative review of patients, physicians and problematic relationships

Abstract

The scope of this study was to assess the literature on the characteristics of patients, physicians, and physician-patient relationships considered ‘problematic.’ An integrative review of primary studies published between January 1, 2016, and September 30, 2021, in Portugue-se, English and Spanish was conducted, Of the 3,414 papers identified in the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Lilacs databases, 19 were selected for qualitative analysis. Seven studies were carried out in Europe, eight in North America, two in South America and two in China, totaling 1,694 patients, 1,903 assistant physicians, 101 residents and 160 medical academics. Physicians and academics considered the following to be proble-matic: patients with clinical conditions such as psychosomatic and chronic illnesses; symptoms and complaints such as pain; powerful emotions; problems in obtaining and sharing information, in decision-making, in the adherence to the the-rapeutic plan and in their self-care; and some so-ciodemographic and vulnerability characteristics. Among other aspects, patients, or their relatives, considered physicians to be problematic when they did not listen to them or appear to care about their children, Teaching medical communication and systemic interventions are recommended to improve physician-patient relationships. a “d2eEltn1rcddqonrtPocfidpP.