Scheduling charging of electric vehicles in a secured manner by emphasizing cost minimization using blockchain technology and IPFS

28Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this work, Electric Vehicles (EVs) are charged using a new and improved charging mechanism called the Mobile-Vehicle-to-Vehicle (M2V) charging strategy. It is further compared with conventional Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) and Grid-to-Vehicle (G2V) charging strategies. In the proposed work, the charging of vehicles is done in a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) manner; the vehicles are charged using Charging Stations (CSs) or Mobile Vehicles (MVs) in the absence of a central entity. CSs are fixed entities situated at certain locations and act as charge suppliers, whereas MVs act as prosumers, which have the capability of charging themselves and also other vehicles. In the proposed system, blockchain technology is used to tackle the issues related with existing systems, such as privacy, security, lack of trust, etc., and also to promote transparency, data immutability, and a tamper-proof nature. Moreover, to store the data related to traffic, roads, and weather conditions, a centralized entity, i.e., Transport System Information Unit (TSIU), is used. It helps in reducing the road congestion and avoids roadside accidents. In the TSIU, an Inter-Planetary File System (IPFS) is used to store the data in a secured manner after removing the data's redundancy through data filtration. Furthermore, four different types of costs are calculated mathematically, which ultimately contribute towards calculating the total charging cost. The shortest distance between a vehicle and the charging entities is calculated using the Great-Circle Distance formula. Moving on, both the time taken to traverse this shortest distance and the time to charge the vehicles are calculated using real-time data of four EVs. Location privacy is also proposed in this work to provide privacy to vehicle users. The power flow and the related energy losses for the above-mentioned charging strategies are also discussed in this work. An incentive provisioning mechanism is also proposed on the basis of timely delivery of credible messages, which further promotes users' participation. In the end, simulations are performed and results are obtained that prove the efficiency of the proposed work, as compared to conventional techniques, in minimizing the EVs' charging cost, time, and distance.

References Powered by Scopus

Security and Privacy in Decentralized Energy Trading Through Multi-Signatures, Blockchain and Anonymous Messaging Streams

1046Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Enabling Localized Peer-to-Peer Electricity Trading among Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles Using Consortium Blockchains

1037Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

BlockChain: A Distributed Solution to Automotive Security and Privacy

675Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Blockchain Technology for Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic review of challenges and opportunities of blockchain for e-voting

123Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A blockchain based incentive provisioning scheme for traffic event validation and information storage in VANETs

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Javed, M. U., Javaid, N., Aldegheishem, A., Alrajeh, N., Tahir, M., & Ramzan, M. (2020). Scheduling charging of electric vehicles in a secured manner by emphasizing cost minimization using blockchain technology and IPFS. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125151

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

66%

Researcher 5

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 9

39%

Computer Science 6

26%

Business, Management and Accounting 6

26%

Environmental Science 2

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0