Engaging people who inject drugs and their peers in HIV testing and harm reduction in Ukraine: do they make a difference?

4Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: People Who Inject Drugs (PWID) should be offered HIV-testing and harm reduction services. We assessed the effectiveness of including PWID and their peers in HIV-testing by comparing for a period before (2013-2014) and after their introduction (2015-2017), the a) numbers HIV tested b) number enrolled in harm reduction and c) frequency of HIV-testing. METHODOLOGY: An analysis of programme data involved PWID aged ≥ 14 years (1st January 2013-31st December 2017) in Ukraine. Between 2013-2014, HIV-testing (VCT) was done by trained health workers. From 2015, this was Directly Assisted HIV Self-testing (DAST) done by social workers and peers. Optimized HIV case finding (OCF) was introduced (in 2016) as an overlapping strategy with DAST. RESULTS: A total of 844,837 HIV tests were done with 23,427 (2.8%) HIV-positive results. With VCT, there were 164,417 HIV tests compared to 639,685 after engagement of PWID and their peers (>3-fold increase). The highest HIV positive yield (20%) was when OCF was included. With increasing HIV-testing caseload, a progressive decrease in enrollment in harm reduction was seen (85% in 2014 to 47% in 2017, X2 for trend P < 0.001). OCF resulted in enrollment into harm reduction of 2722 HIV-positives, which was 35% higher than through DAST alone (7,5%). HIV re-testing almost doubled with DAST. CONCLUSION: Active engagement of PWID and their peers in HIV-testing increased uptake of HIV-testing. Including OCF has a synergistic effect in HIV-positive yield. Strategies are urgently needed to ensure that individuals who are HIV tested are enrolled in harm reduction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kravchenko, N., Denisiuk, O., Kuznetsova, J., Jayaraj, J., Zachariah, R., & Smyrnov, P. (2019). Engaging people who inject drugs and their peers in HIV testing and harm reduction in Ukraine: do they make a difference? Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, 13(71), 118S-125S. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.11293

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free