Zeros and passivity of Arnoldi-reduced-order models for interconnect networks

17Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

CAD tools and research in the area of reduced-order modeling of large linear interconnect networks have evolved from merely finding a Pade approximation for the given network transfer function to finding an approximate transfer function that preserves such circuit-theoretic properties of the network as stability, passivity, and RLC synthesizability. In particular, preserving passivity guarantees that the reduced-order models will be well-behaved when embedded back in the circuit where the interconnect network originated. While stability can be ascertained by studying the poles of the reduced-order transfer function, passivity depends on both the poles and zeros of the network driving-point impedance. In this paper, we present a novel method for studying the zeros of reduced-order transfer functions and show how it yields conclusions about passivity and synthesizability. Moreover, in order to obtain a guaranteed-passive reduced-order model for multiport RC networks, a new algorithm based on the Arnoldi iteration is presented. This algorithm is as computationally efficient as the one used to generate guaranteed-stable reduced-order models [1].

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Krylov-subspace methods for reduced-order modeling in circuit simulation

349Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Projection-based approaches for model reduction of weakly nonlinear, time-varying systems

203Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Passive multipoint moment matching model order reduction algorithm on multiport distributed interconnect networks

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elfadel, I. M., & Ling, D. D. (1997). Zeros and passivity of Arnoldi-reduced-order models for interconnect networks. In Proceedings - Design Automation Conference (pp. 28–33). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1145/266021.266030

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘17‘19‘2401234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

27%

Researcher 3

27%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 9

60%

Physics and Astronomy 3

20%

Mathematics 2

13%

Computer Science 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0