Overview of Cosmetic Regulatory Frameworks around the World

36Citations
Citations of this article
270Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To ensure safety and efficacy, cosmetic products are regulated and controlled worldwide. However, the regulatory approaches of each country may be significantly different and impact the competitiveness and economic viability of the industry. This work presents an updated review and comparison of regulatory requirements from the European Union, United States of America, Canada, Japan, People’s Republic of China and Brazil. It outlines contents such as the definition, classification and categorization of cosmetics, pre-market requirements, ingredients management, general labelling requirements, regulation of claims concerning advertisement and commercial practices, increase of animal testing and marketing bans on cosmetic products. Furthermore, it weighs the impact of regulatory differences on the safety and accessibility of these products in the mentioned regions.

References Powered by Scopus

Final publication of the “regulations on the supervision and administration of cosmetics” and new prospectives of cosmetic science in china

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Packaging evaluation approach to improve cosmetic product safety

10Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Marine Natural Products as Innovative Cosmetic Ingredients

35Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Safe nanomaterials: from their use, application, and disposal to regulations

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Nanomaterials in Cosmetics: An Outlook for European Regulatory Requirements and a Step Forward in Sustainability

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ferreira, M., Matos, A., Couras, A., Marto, J., & Ribeiro, H. (2022, August 1). Overview of Cosmetic Regulatory Frameworks around the World. Cosmetics. MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/cosmetics9040072

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘2504080120160

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 41

77%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

9%

Researcher 5

9%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 27

47%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 12

21%

Chemistry 11

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 4

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0