Linguistic summarization of time series data using genetic algorithms

23Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, the use of an evolutionary approach when obtaining linguistic summaries from time series data is proposed. We assume the availability of a hierarchical partition of the time dimension in the time series. The use of natural language allows the human users to understand the resulting summaries in an easy way. The number of possible final summaries and the different ways of measuring their quality has taken us to adopt the use of a multi objective evolutionary algorithm. We compare the results of the new approach with our previous greedy algorithms. © 2011. The authors-Published by Atlantis Press.

References Powered by Scopus

Fuzzy sets

71627Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: NSGA-II

4040Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages

1503Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On the role of linguistic descriptions of data in the building of natural language generation systems

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On generating linguistic descriptions of time series

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The linguistic summarization and the interpretability, scalability of fuzzy representations of multilevel semantic structures of word-domains

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Castillo-Ortega, R., Marín, N., Sánchez, D., & Tettamanz, A. G. B. (2011). Linguistic summarization of time series data using genetic algorithms. In Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, EUSFLAT 2011 and French Days on Fuzzy Logic and Applications, LFA 2011 (Vol. 1, pp. 416–423). https://doi.org/10.2991/eusflat.2011.145

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

62%

Researcher 3

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 13

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free