Early neuromuscular recovery characteristics following administration of mivacurium plus vecuronium

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: This study was designed to describe the early recovery characteristics, as well as the speed of onset of neuromuscular block, after a combination of mivacurium and vecuronium. Methods: In this controlled, randomized study, 30 consenting ASA I-III patients were assigned to three treatment groups. The '2M2V' group received twice the dose necessary to cause 95% depression of the evoked twitch response (2 x ED95) of mivacurium (0.15 mg · kg-1) plus 2 x ED95 of vecuronium (0.1 mg · kg-1); the '2V' group received 2 x ED95 of vecuronium; and the '4V' group received 4 x ED95 of vecuronium. Evoked neuromuscular responses of the adductor pollicis were assessed with an adductor pollicis force transducer. The time until maximum block and times to 10% and 25% recovery (T10 and T25) in each group were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and compared using ANOVA. Results: Onset of block in the 2M2V group was 27% faster than in the 2V group (2.0 ± 0.6 vs. 2.7 ± 0.8 min respectively, P < 0.05) and was similar to the 4V group (1.95 ± 0.3 min, P = NS). The times until 10% recovery were similar in the 2M2V and 4V groups (59.9 ± 12 vs 68.2 ± 25 min, P = NS) and were slower than in the 2V group (37.2 ± 9 min, P < 0.05). Between T10 and T25 recovery after 2M2V resembled that after 2V (6.7 ± 3 vs 5.7 ± min, P = NS) and was faster than after 4V (10.9 ± 7 min, P < 0.05). Conclusions. When 2 x ED95 of mivacurium is added to 2 x ED95 of an intermediate or long-acting relaxant, recovery after T10 will proceed as if one had administered the longer-acting agent alone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stout, R. G., Brull, S. J., Kelly, D., & Silverman, D. G. (1996). Early neuromuscular recovery characteristics following administration of mivacurium plus vecuronium. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia, 43(4), 358–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03011714

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free