Comparison of crystal structure between carbonated hydroxyapatite and natural bone apatite with theoretical calculation

24Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, nanosized carbonated hydroxyapatite and stoichiometric hydroxyapatite were synthesized. Chemical analyses, as well as infrared spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction, were applied to investigate the composition, structure and chemical groups of all the samples. Furthermore, the structure and the crystal energy of all samples were analyzed by software and the mathematic methods. The results show that when CO32- is added into the solution after the reaction, the carbonated hydroxyapatite samples and natural bone apatite are similar in crystal structure, composition and crystallite size. Chemical analyses suggest that natural bone apatite and all synthetic carbonated hydroxyapatite samples have the same molecular formula. Meanwhile, the computed crystal energy indicates that the carbonated hydroxyapatite type-B substitution has lower crystal energy and better stability. Moreover, the fitting FTIR spectra prove that there is more type-B substitution than type-A substitution in all samples.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, W. H., Xi, X. F., Li, J. F., & Cai, K. Y. (2013). Comparison of crystal structure between carbonated hydroxyapatite and natural bone apatite with theoretical calculation. Asian Journal of Chemistry, 25(7), 3673–3678. https://doi.org/10.14233/ajchem.2013.13709

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free