Lansoprazole pharmacokinetics differ in patients with oesophagitis compared to healthy volunteers

11Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To compare the pharmacokinetics of lansoprazole in patients with reflux oesophagitis and in healthy volunteers, after a single dose and at steady-state. Patients and methods: A 30 mg dose of lansoprazole was administered orally daily for 7 days in eight healthy male volunteers aged 21-24 years, and in 16 patients aged 29-65 years with grade 2 or 3 reflux oesophagitis. The pharmacokinetics were assessed over the 24 h dose interval following the first dose and again after the 7th dose. Results: Within both the patient and volunteers groups, there were no significant differences between day 1 and day 7 in any of the pharmacokinetic parameters including maximum concentration (C(max)), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), and terminal half-life of elimination (t( 1/2 )). However, on both days 1 and 7, values were significantly higher in the patients than in the healthy volunteers. On day 7, C(max) was 1343 ng/mL in patients compared with 765 ng/mL in healthy volunteers, AUC was 3458 ng.h/mL vs. 1350 ng.h/mL and t( 1/2 ) was 1.62 h vs. 0.90 h. Conclusion: The differences in results for the pharmacokinetics reflect reduced lansoprazole clearance in the patient group. Other research has not found a difference in pharmacokinetics when comparing healthy volunteers with patients with acid-related disorders. The difference in lansoprazole clearance in this study may be related to a variety of factors that are different in patients compared with young normal volunteers, such as age, gender, other drugs, and reduced general well-being.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barclay, M. L., Begg, E. J., Robson, R. A., Peters, W. A., & Ketelbey, J. W. (1999). Lansoprazole pharmacokinetics differ in patients with oesophagitis compared to healthy volunteers. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 13(9), 1215–1219. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2036.1999.00595.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free