Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of phenotype-based search approaches using publicly available online databases. Methods: We included consecutively solved cases from our exome database. For each case, the combination of Human Phenotype Ontology terms reported by the referring clinician was used to perform a search in three commonly used databases: OMIM (first 300 results), Phenolyzer (first 300 results), and Mendelian (all 100 results). Results: One hundred cases were included (43 females; mean age: 10 years). The actual molecular diagnosis identified through exome sequencing was not included in the search results of any of the queried databases in 33% of cases. In 85% of cases it was not found within the top five search results. When included, its median rank was 61 (range: 1–295), 21 (1–270), and 29 (1–92) in OMIM, Phenolyzer and Mendelian, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that, in most cases, phenotype-based search approaches using public online databases is ineffective in providing a probable diagnosis for Mendelian conditions. Genotype-first approach through molecular-guided diagnostics with backward phenotyping may be a more appropriate approach for these disorders, unless a specific diagnosis is considered a priori based on highly unique phenotypic features or a specific facial gestalt.
CITATION STYLE
Fellner, A., Ruhrman-Shahar, N., Orenstein, N., Lidzbarsky, G., Shuldiner, A. R., Gonzaga-Jauregui, C., … Basel-Salmon, L. (2021). The role of phenotype-based search approaches using public online databases in diagnostics of Mendelian disorders. Genetics in Medicine, 23(6), 1095–1100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-01085-7
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.