Exploring auction mechanisms for role assignment in teams of autonomous robots

13Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We are exploring the use of auction mechanisms to assign roles within a team of agents operating in a dynamic environment. Depending on the degree of collaboration between the agents and the specific auction policies employed, we can obtain varying combinations of role assignments that can affect both the speed and the quality of task execution. In order to examine this extremely large set of combinations, we have developed a theoretical framework and an environment in which to experiment and evaluate the various options in policies and levels of collaboration. This paper describes our framework and experimental environment. We present results from examining a set of representative policies within our test domain - a high-level simulation of the RoboCup four-legged league soccer environment. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

References Powered by Scopus

A taxonomy for multi-agent robotics

296Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Collaborative multi-robot localization

48Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Monitoring deployed agent teams

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Distributed problem solving

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multiple mobile robot systems: A survey of recent work

59Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Progress on Agent Coordination with Cooperative Auctions

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Frias-Martinez, V., Sklar, E., & Parsons, S. (2005). Exploring auction mechanisms for role assignment in teams of autonomous robots. In Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence (Subseries of Lecture Notes in Computer Science) (Vol. 3276, pp. 532–539). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32256-6_49

Readers over time

‘11‘13‘14‘15‘17‘19‘2000.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Researcher 3

30%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

56%

Engineering 4

44%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0