Two Approaches to Instrumental Rationality and Belief Consistency

  • Brunero J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

R. Jay Wallace argues that the normativity of instrumental rationality can be traced to the independent rational requirement to hold consistent beliefs. I present three objections to this view. John Broome argues that there is a structural similarity between the rational requirements of instrumental rationality and belief consistency. Since he does not reduce the former to the latter, his view can avoid the objections to Wallace’s view. However, we should not think Broome’s account explains the whole of instrumental rationality since agents with consistent intentions can still fail in their instrumental reasoning. This consideration makes Broome’s approach vulnerable to a line of criticism that both he and Wallace present against Christine Korsgaard’s conception of instrumental rationality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brunero, J. (2017). Two Approaches to Instrumental Rationality and Belief Consistency. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v1i1.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free