Worse preoperative status based on inflammation and host immunity is a risk factor for surgical site infections in colorectal cancer surgery

33Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) is an inflammation-based measure of malnutrition that reflects a state of cachexia in cancer patients. We evaluated mGPS as an index to predict surgical site infection (SSI) incidence in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Subjects and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 351 patients who underwent colon cancer resection. Factors correlated with the incidence of SSIs were identified by logistic analysis and stepwise selection. Results: SSIs were observed in 32 patients, with an incidence of 9.1%. Univariate logistic analysis revealed mGPS (Score 2), laparotomy, resection of other organs, colostomy, excessive blood loss (>423 mL), long duration of surgery (>279 minutes), pulmonary dysfunction, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) 40, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR)(>4), and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) 2 to be associated with an increased incidence of SSIs. Multivariate analysis with variables selected by the stepwise procedure also revealed mGPS (Score 2) (Odds ratio (OR)=3.55, 95% Confidence interval (CI) 1.30- 9.56; p=0.01), colostomy (OR=6.56, 95%CI 1.60-31.38; p=0.01), excessive blood loss (OR=3.20, 95%CI 1.23-8.42; p=0.02), and NLR (>4)(OR=3.24, 95%CI 1.31-8.17; p=0.01) to be independent risk factors. Conclusion: mGPS is an independent risk factor for SSIs. Our results suggest that cachexia before surgery in patients with colorectal cancer might predict the incidence of SSIs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sagawa, M., Yoshimatsu, K., Yokomizo, H., Yano, Y., Okayama, S., Usui, T., … Naritaka, Y. (2017). Worse preoperative status based on inflammation and host immunity is a risk factor for surgical site infections in colorectal cancer surgery. Journal of Nippon Medical School, 84(5), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.1272/jnms.84.224

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free