Comparing weighting models for monolingual information retrieval

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Motivated by the hypothesis that the retrieval performance of a weighting model is independent of the language in which queries and collection are expressed, we compared the retrieval performance of three weighting models, i.e., Okapi, statistical language modeling (SLM), and deviation from randomness (DFR), on three monolingual test collections, i.e., French, Italian, and Spanish. The DFR model was found to consistently achieve better results than both Okapi and SLM, whose performance was comparable. We also evaluated whether the use of retrieval feedback improved retrieval performance; retrieval feedback was beneficial for DFR and Okapi and detrimental for SLM. Besides relative performance, DFR with retrieval feedback achieved excellent absolute results: best run for Italian and Spanish, third run for French. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amati, G., Carpineto, C., & Romano, G. (2004). Comparing weighting models for monolingual information retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 3237, 310–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30222-3_29

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free