Postprandial endothelial dysfunction in subjects with new-onset type 2 diabetes: An acarbose and nateglinide comparative study

64Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Postprandial hyperglycemia is believed to affect vascular endothelial function. The aim of our study was to compare the effects of acarbose and nateglinide on postprandial endothelial dysfunction.Methods: We recruited a total of 30 patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (19 men and 11 women, age 67.8 ± 7.3 years). Patients were randomly assigned to 3 groups receiving either 300 mg/day acarbose, 270 mg/day nateglinide, or no medication. A cookie test (consisting of 75 g carbohydrate, 25 g butter fat, and 7 g protein for a total of 553 kcal) was performed as dietary tolerance testing. During the cookie test, glucose and insulin levels were determined at 0, 30, 60, and 120 min after load. In addition, endothelial function was assessed by % flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery at 0 and 120 min after cookie load.Results: Postprandial glucose and insulin levels were similar in the 3 groups. Postprandial endothelial dysfunction was similar in the 3 groups before treatment. After 12 weeks of intervention, postprandial FMD was significantly improved in the acarbose group compared with the control group (6.8 ± 1.3% vs 5.2 ± 1.1%, p = 0.0022). Area under the curve (AUC) for insulin response was significantly increased in the nateglinide and control groups; however, no significant change was observed in the acarbose group.Conclusions: Our results suggest that acarbose improves postprandial endothelial function by improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia, independent of postprandial hyperinsulinemia. Acarbose may thus have more beneficial effects on postprandial endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes than nateglinide. © 2010 Kato et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Figures

  • Table 1: Characteristics of study subjects before and after treatment
  • Figure 1 Glucose and insulin levels at each time point during a cookie test in the control, acarbose and nateglinide groups. Plasma glucose and insulin levels were not changed at any time point in the controls after 12 weeks. Plasma glucose levels at 30 min during the cookie test were significantly decreased after 12 weeks of treatment with acarbose. Plasma insulin levels at 30 and 60 min were significantly increased after 12 weeks of nateglinide treatment.
  • Figure 2 Fasting and postprandial FMD at baseline and 12 weeks after treatment in the control, acarbose and nateglinide groups. At baseline before treatment, fasting FMD was similar among the 3 groups. Postprandial FMD (120 min after cookie load) was significantly lower than fasting FMD in each group. After 12 weeks of treatment, fasting FMD was not significantly different in any of the 3 groups compared to baseline before treatment. Postprandial FMD was lower than fasting FMD in all 3 groups. Postprandial FMD was significantly higher in the acarbose group than in the control group after 12 weeks of treatment.
  • Figure 3 Postprandial percent decrease in FMD [(postprandial FMD-fasting FMD) × 100/fasting FMD] in the control, acarbose and nateglinide groups after 12 weeks of treatment. The postprandial decrease in FMD was significantly suppressed in the acarbose group, compared to the control and nateglinide groups. The postprandial FMD decrease in nateglinide group was also suppressed compared to the control group.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kato, T., Inoue, T., & Node, K. (2010). Postprandial endothelial dysfunction in subjects with new-onset type 2 diabetes: An acarbose and nateglinide comparative study. Cardiovascular Diabetology, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2840-9-12

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 19

73%

Researcher 3

12%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 17

59%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6

21%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

14%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0