Perioperative outcomes and quality of life after repair of recurrent hiatal hernia are compromised compared with primary repair

Abstract

Paraesophageal hernia repair (PEHR) is burdened by high recurrence rates that frequently lead to redo PEHR. Revisional surgery, because of higher complexity, higher risk of injury, and the intrinsic risk of recurrence, has increased likelihood of higher complication rates and decreased quality of life (QOL) postoperatively.We aimed to compare perioperative outcomes and QOL after revisional and primary PEHR. A retrospective review of all patients who underwent PEHR for a recurrent hernia between January 2011 and July 2016 was completed. These were matched with a contemporary cohort of patients who underwent primary PEHR by age, gender, and BMI. Perioperative measures were compared. The patients were invited to complete the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) to assess response to surgical intervention. There were 24 patients (group 1) who underwent revisional PEHR, and they were matched to 48 patients (group 2) who had a primary hernia repair. Thirteen patients in group 1 responded to the survey (54%), whereas 21 patients' responses were received from group 2 (44%). Conversion rates, LOS, and mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index scores were significantly different between the two groups. Reoperative procedures for paraesophageal and hiatal hernias are burdened by higher conversion rates and length of stay, with similar overall complication rates. Patients who are undergoing repair of a recurrent hernia should be preoperatively counseled, and should have realistic expectations of their GI QOL after surgery.