Neuraxial versus general anesthesia in a patient with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A 72-year-old gentleman with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis (AS) presents for right hip replacement after a fall at home. He was diagnosed with severe AS months before due to a murmur on physical examination, leading to an echocardiogram showing an aortic valve area of 0.9 cm2 with a mean gradient of 40 mm Hg and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 55 %. He is fully functional in his activities of daily living and denies dyspnea on exertion, angina, or syncopal episodes. He has no risk factors for a difficult airway on physical examination. You are asked to devise a safe anesthetic plan for his hip replacement, weighing the risks and benefits of neuraxial versus general anesthesia in light of his cardiac condition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smollen, P. B., & Atchabahian, A. (2016). Neuraxial versus general anesthesia in a patient with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. In You’re Wrong, I’m Right: Dueling Authors Reexamine Classic Teachings in Anesthesia (pp. 79–80). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43169-7_22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free