Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence

32Citations
Citations of this article
114Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To compare pre-eclampsia risk factors identified by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with risk factors from hierarchical evidence review, to guide pre-eclampsia prevention. Design: Our search strategy provided hierarchical evidence of relationships between risk factors and pre-eclampsia using Medline (Ovid), searched from January 2010 to January 2021. Setting: Published studies and CPGs. Population: Pregnant women. Methods: We evaluated the strength of association and quality of evidence (GRADE). CPGs (n = 15) were taken from a previous systematic review. Main outcome measure: Pre-eclampsia. Results: Of 78 pre-eclampsia risk factors, 13 (16.5%) arise only during pregnancy. Strength of association was usually ‘probable’ (n = 40, 51.3%) and the quality of evidence was low (n = 35, 44.9%). The ‘major’ and ‘moderate’ risk factors proposed by 8/15 CPGs were not well aligned with the evidence; of the ten ‘major’ risk factors (alone warranting aspirin prophylaxis), associations with pre-eclampsia were definite (n = 4), probable (n = 5) or possible (n = 1), based on moderate (n = 4), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 1) quality evidence. Obesity (‘moderate’ risk factor) was definitely associated with pre-eclampsia (high-quality evidence). The other ten ‘moderate’ risk factors had probable (n = 8), possible (n = 1) or no (n = 1) association with pre-eclampsia, based on evidence of moderate (n = 1), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 4) quality. Three risk factors not identified by the CPGs had probable associations (high quality): being overweight; ‘prehypertension’ at booking; and blood pressure of 130–139/80–89 mmHg in early pregnancy. Conclusions: Pre-eclampsia risk factors in CPGs are poorly aligned with evidence, particularly for the strongest risk factor of obesity. There is a lack of distinction between risk factors identifiable in early pregnancy and those arising later. A refresh of the strategies advocated by CPGs is needed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elawad, T., Scott, G., Bone, J. N., Elwell, H., Lopez, C. E., Filippi, V., … Magee, L. A. (2024). Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 131(1), 46–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17320

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free