College-for-All: Alternative Options and Procedures

1Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter discusses how the status attainment model has been integral to our understanding of the factors affecting average educational attainment, but it poorly describes institutional procedures and individual strategies that lead to academic success. We pose new issues for understanding the experiences of the growing populations of disadvantaged students in open-admissions 2-year colleges. We describe the experiences of individuals from a small study to provide evidence of how disadvantaged students manage to beat the odds and attain educational success. While we cannot address issues of generalizability, we describe alternative sequences and pathways to educational attainment, institutional supports and procedures, and their self-identified sources of direction, despite the major obstacles and setbacks. We situate our cases in prior extensions of the status attainment model to consider alternative mechanisms to educational attainment. These analyses are crucial if we are to understand the dynamic processes that drive educational attainment despite major obstacles.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rosenbaum, J. E., Ahearn, C., & Lansing, J. (2018). College-for-All: Alternative Options and Procedures. In Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research (pp. 431–455). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76694-2_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free