The classical Yao principle states that the complexity R∈(f) of an optimal randomized algorithm for a function f with success probability1 - e equals the complexity max„ D∈μ(f) of an optimal deterministic algorithm for f that is correct on a fraction 1 - ∈ of the inputs, weighed according to the hardest distribution μ over the inputs. In this paper we investigate to what extent such a principle holds for quantum algorithms. We propose two natural candidate quantum Yao principles, a “weak” and a “strong” one. For both principles, we prove that the quantum bounded-error complexityis a lower bound on the quantum analogues of max„ D∈μ(f). We then prove that equalitycannot be obtained for the “strong” version, byexhibiting an exponential gap. On the other hand, as a positive result we prove that the “weak” version holds up to a constant factor for the querycomplexityof all symmetric Boolean functions.
CITATION STYLE
De Graaf, M., & De Wolf, R. (2002). On quantum versions of the yao principle. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 2285, pp. 347–358). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45841-7_28
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.