Understanding the Experiences of Rural-and Remote-Living Patients Accessing Sub-Acute Care in Queensland: A Qualitative Descriptive Analysi-

Abstract

Introduction: The challenges associated with equitable healthcare access are often more pronounced for individuals living in rural and remote locations, compared to those in metropolitan locations. This study examined the health care transitions of rural-and remote-living patients with on-going sub-acute needs, following acute hospital discharge. This was done with the aim of exploring these patients’ experiences of client-centeredness and continuity of care, and identifying common challenges faced by rural and remote sub-acute patients accessing and transitioning to and through sub-acute care in a non-metropolitan context. Materials and Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 37 sub-acute patients. A qualitative descriptive approach was used to analyze the interview data and explore key emergent themes in relation to client-centeredness, continuity of care, and sub-acute transition challenges. Results: Interview participants’ average length of stay in sub-acute care was 31.6 days (range = 8–86 days), with most transitioning from larger regional and metropolitan hospitals to on-going rural or remote sub-acute care (n = 19; 53%). Client-centeredness was primarily characterized by the quality of interpersonal experiences with staff, patient and familial involvement in care planning, and the degree to which patients felt their wishes were respected and advocated for. Continuity of care was characterized by access to and participation in rehabilitation services, and access to family and social supports. Challenges associated with sub-acute transitions were explored. Discussion: The findings suggest important implications for health care providers, including the need to implement earlier and more frequent opportunities for patient involvement throughout the sub-acute journey. The results offer a unique perspective on the way that continuity of care is experienced and conceptualized by rural and remote patients, suggesting a revision of what is required to achieve equitable care continuity for rural and remote residents receiving care far from home. Conclusion: It is pertinent for health care providers to consider the unique complexities associated with accessing on-going health care as a rural or remote Australian resident, and to develop mechanisms that support equitable access and continuity and facilitate continuity of care closer to home.