Complete specialization in classical economics

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The so-called modern interpretation of Ricardian theory of comparative advantage results in the drastic conclusion that each country (England or Portugal) specializes entirely in the production of a single commodity (cloth or wine). But Ricardo himself was merely concerned with marginal adjustments of production to the given terms of trade in his famous theory of gains from foreign trade. Ricardo has nothing to do with the complete specialization. It was J. S. Mill, however, who used the assumption of the complete specialization skillfully to determine the terms of trade uniquely in his theory of the reciprocal demand. Classical economists, including Bastable and W. T. Thornton, critically discussed many important aspects of Mill’s theory, but they did not seem to raise the objection to Mill’s assumption of entire specialization. It was Pareto, a neoclassical economist, who presented a numerical example for which the assumption is inappropriate.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Negishi, T. (2014). Complete specialization in classical economics. In Advances in Japanese Business and Economics (Vol. 2, pp. 151–165). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-54433-3_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free