A two-cool-season wind profiler-based analysis of westward-directed gap flow through the columbia river gorge

8Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This observational study of westward-directed gap flows through the Columbia River Gorge uses three radar wind profilers during two winter seasons between October 2015 and April 2017, with a focus on the gapexit region at Troutdale, Oregon. Of the 92 gap-flow events identified at Troutdale, the mean duration was 38.5 h, the mean gap-jet speed was 12ms-1, and the mean gap-flow depth was 570mMSL. The mean gap-jet height and gap-flow depthwere situated belowthe top of the inner gorge, while amaximumdepth of 1087mMSL was contained within the gorge's outer-wall rim. The mean gap-flow depth was deepest in the cold-air source region east of the gorge and decreased westward to the coast. Strong gap-flow events were longer lived, deeper, and capped by stronger vertical shear than their weak counterparts, and strong (weak) events were forced primarily by a cold-interior anticyclone (offshore cyclone). Deep gap-flow events were longer lived, stronger, and had weaker capping vertical shear than shallow events, and represented a combination of gap-flow and synoptic forcing. Composite temporal analysis shows that gap-flow strength (depth) was maximized midevent (early event), freezing rain was most prevalent during the second half of the event, and accumulated precipitation was greatest late-event. Gap-flow events tended to begin (end) during the evening (morning) hours and were most persistent in January. Surface wind gusts and snow occurrences around Portland, Oregon, were associated primarily with the deepest gap flows, whereas freezing rain occurred predominantly during shallow gap flows.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Neiman, P. J., Gottas, D. J., & White, A. B. (2019). A two-cool-season wind profiler-based analysis of westward-directed gap flow through the columbia river gorge. Monthly Weather Review, 147(12), 4653–4680. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-19-0026.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free