Glycemic outcomes in adults with T1D are impacted more by continuous glucose monitoring than by insulin delivery method: 3 years of follow-up from the comisair study

171Citations
Citations of this article
162Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This study assessed the clinical impact of four treatment strategies in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D): real-Time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) with multiple daily insulin injections (rtCGM1MDI), rtCGM with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (rtCGM1CSII), self-monitoring of blood glucose with MDI (SMBG1MDI), and SMBG with CSII (SMBG1CSII). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This 3-year, nonrandomized, prospective, real-world, clinical trial followed 94 participants with T1D (rtCGM1MDI, n522; rtCGM1CSII, n526; SMBG1MDI, n521; SMBG1CSII, n525). The main end points were changes in A1C, time in range (70- 180 mg/dL [3.9-10 mmol/L]), time below range (<70 mg/dL [<3.9 mmol/L]), glycemic variability, and incidence of hypoglycemia. RESULTS At 3 years, the rtCGM groups (rtCGM1MDIand rtCGM1CSII) had significantly lower A1C (7.0% [53 mmol/mol], P 5 0.0002, and 6.9% [52 mmol/mol], P < 0.0001, respectively), compared with the SMBG1CSII and SMBG1MDI groups (7.7% [61 mmol/mol], P 5 0.3574, and 8.0% [64 mmol/mol], P 5 1.000, respectively), with no significant difference between the rtCGM groups. Significant improvements in percentage of time in rangewereobserved in thertCGMsubgroups (rtCGM1MDI, 48.7-69.0%, P < 0.0001; and rtCGM1CSII, 50.9-72.3%, P < 0.0001) and in the SMBG1CSII group (50.6-57.8%, P 5 0.0114). Significant reductions in time below range were found only in the rtCGM subgroups (rtCGM1MDI, 9.4-5.5%, P50.0387; and rtCGM1CSII, 9.0-5.3%, P 5 0.0235). Seven severe hypoglycemia episodes occurred: SMBG groups, n 5 5; sensor-Augmented insulin regimen groups, n 5 2. CONCLUSIONS rtCGM was superior to SMBG in reducing A1C, hypoglycemia, and other end points in individuals with T1Dregardless of their insulin delivery method.rtCGM1MDIcan be considered an equivalent but lower-cost alternative to sensor-Augmented insulin pump therapy and superior to treatment with SMBG1MDI or SMBG1CSII therapy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Šoupal, J., Petruželkov&acute;a, L., Grunberger, G., H&acute;askov&acute;a, A., Flekač, M., Matoulek, M., … Pŕazńy, M. (2020). Glycemic outcomes in adults with T1D are impacted more by continuous glucose monitoring than by insulin delivery method: 3 years of follow-up from the comisair study. Diabetes Care, 43(1), 37–43. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc19-0888

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free