The regular real-time languages

86Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A specification formalism for reactive systems defines a class of ω-languages. We call a specification formalism fully decidable if it is constructively closed under boolean operations and has a dccidable satisfiability (nonemptiness) problem. There are two important, robust classes of ω-languages that are definable by fully dccidable formalisms. The ω-regular languages are definable by finite automata, or equivalcntly, by the Sequential Calculus. The counter-free ω-regular languages are definable by temporal logic, or equivalcntly, by the first-order fragment of the Sequential Calculus. The gap between both classes can be closed by finite counting (using automata connectives), or equivalently, by projection (existential second-order quantification over letters). A specification formalism for real-time systems defines a class of timed w-langnages, whose letters have real-numbered time stamps. Two popular ways of specifying timing constraints rely on the use of clocks, and on the use of time bounds for temporal operators. However, temporal logics with clocks or time bounds have undecidable satisfiability problems, and finite automata with clocks (so-called timed automata) are not closed under complement. Therefore, two fully dccidable restrictions of these formalisms have been proposed. In the first case, clocks are restricted to event clocks, which measure distances to immediately preceding or succeeding events only. In the second case, time bounds are restricted to nonsingular intervals, which cannot specify the exact punctuality of events. We show that the resulting classes of timed ω-languages are robust, and we explain their relationship. First, we show that temporal logic with event clocks defines the same class of timed ω-languages as temporal logic with nonsingular time bounds, and we identify a first-order monadic theory that also defines this class. Second, we show that if the ability of finite counting is added to these formalisms, we obtain the class of timed ω-lauguages that are definable by finite automata with event clocks, or equivalently, by a restricted second-order extension of the monadic theory. Third, we show that if projection is added, we obtain the class of timed ω-languages that are definable by timed automata, or equivalently, by a richer second-order extension of the monadic theory. These results identify three robust classes of timed ω-languages, of which the third, while popular, is not definable by a fully dccidable formalism. Dy contrast, the first two classes are definable by fully dccidable formalisms from temporal logic, from automata theory, and from monadic logic. Since the gap between these two classes can be closed by finite counting, we dub them the timed ω-rcgular languages and the timed counter-free ω-rcgular languages, respectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henzinger, T. A., Raskin, J. F., & Schobbens, P. Y. (1998). The regular real-time languages. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 1443 LNCS, pp. 580–591). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0055086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free