Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead?

26Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Contemporary intensive care unit (ICU) medicine has complicated the issue of what constitutes death in a life support environment. Not only is the distinction between sapient life and prolongation of vital signs blurred but the concept of death itself has been made more complex. The demand for organs to facilitate transplantation promotes a strong incentive to define clinical death in a manner that most effectively supplies that demand. We consider the problem of defining death in the ICU as a function of viable organ availability for transplantation. © 2005 BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whetstine, L., Streat, S., Darwin, M., & Crippen, D. (2005, December). Pro/con ethics debate: When is dead really dead? Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc3894

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free