Can "model projects of need-adapted care" reduce involuntary hospital treatment and the use of coercive measures?

22Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Intensive outpatient models of need-adapted psychiatric care have been shown to reduce the length of hospital stays and to improve retention in care for people with severe mental illnesses. In contrast, evidence regarding the impact of such models on involuntary hospital treatment and other coercive measures in inpatient settings is still sparse, although these represent important indicators of the patients' wellbeing. In Germany, intensive models of care still have not been routinely implemented, and their effectiveness within the German psychiatric system is only studied in a few pioneering regions. An innovative model of flexible, assertive, need-adapted care established in Berlin, Germany, in 2014, treating unselected 14% of the catchment area's patients, was evaluated on the basis of routine clinical data. Records of n = 302 patients diagnosed with severe mental disorders, who had been hospitalized at least once during a 4-year-observational period, were analyzed in a retrospective individual mirror-image design, comparing the 2 years before and after inclusion in the model project regarding the time spent in hospital, the number and duration of involuntary hospital treatments and the use of direct coercive interventions like restraint or isolation. After inclusion to the project, patients spent significantly less time in hospital. Among patients treated on acute wards and patients with a diagnosis of psychosis, the number of patients subjected to provisional detention due to acute endangerment of self or others decreased significantly, as did the time spent under involuntary hospital treatment. The number of patients subjected to mechanical restraint, but not to isolation, on the ward decreased significantly, while the total number of coercive interventions remained unchanged. Findings suggest some potential of intensive models of need-adapted care to reduce coercive interventions in psychiatry. However, results must be substantiated by evidence from randomized-controlled trials and longer observation periods.

References Powered by Scopus

Patients' reports of traumatic or harmful experiences within the psychiatric setting

375Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

FACT: A Dutch version of ACT

196Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Patients' views and readmissions 1 year after involuntary hospitalisation

184Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Measures to avoid coercion in psychiatry and their efficacy

61Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reduction of involuntary admissions in patients with severe psychotic disorders treated in the access integrated care model including therapeutic assertive community treatment

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Correlates of seclusion and restraint of patients admitted to psychiatric inpatient treatment via a German emergency room

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wullschleger, A., Berg, J., Bermpohl, F., & Montag, C. (2018). Can “model projects of need-adapted care” reduce involuntary hospital treatment and the use of coercive measures? Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9(MAY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00168

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

68%

Researcher 3

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 14

54%

Psychology 7

27%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

12%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free