Accountability and reflective responsibility in information systems

12Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper discusses the role of accountability in responsibility ascriptions regarding information and communication technology (ICT). It starts with a definition of responsibility as the social construct representing the ascription of an object to a subject. Recounting the traditional responsibility, the paper will point out the weaknesses of responsibility with regards to ICT. It will then propose an alternative way of dealing with responsibility under the heading of "reflective responsibility". Accountability will be defined as the structures and institutions that establish a link between object and subject. As such it is a necessary condition of successful responsibility ascriptions. The paper will discuss the influence of ICT on the construction of accountability and consequently on responsibility. It will highlight the problem of pathological accountability where accountability becomes reified and solidified and in effect goes counter to the social aim of responsibility. The paper will conclude with a discussion of how problems and pathologies of accountability can be overcome in order for reflective responsibility to be able to fulfill its purpose. © 2006 International Federation for Information Processing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stahl, B. C. (2006). Accountability and reflective responsibility in information systems. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, 195, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-31168-8_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free