The YOU CALL–WE CALL Randomized Clinical Trial

  • Rochette A
  • Korner-Bitensky N
  • Bishop D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background—Comparison of a multimodal intervention WE CALL (study initiated phone support/information provision) versus a passive intervention YOU CALL (participant can contact a resource person) in individuals with first mild stroke. Methods and Results—This study is a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Primary outcome includes unplanned use of health services (participant diaries) for adverse events and quality of life (Euroquol-5D, Quality of Life Index). Secondary outcomes include planned use of health services (diaries), mood (Beck Depression Inventory II), and participation (Assessment of Life Habits [LIFE-H]). Blind assessments were done at baseline, 6, and 12 months. A mixed model approach for statistical analysis on an intention-to-treat basis was used where the group factor was intervention type and occasion factor time, with a significance level of 0.01. We enrolled 186 patients (WE=92; YOU=94) with a mean age of 62.5±12.5 years, and 42.5% were women. No significant differences were seen...

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rochette, A., Korner-Bitensky, N., Bishop, D., Teasell, R., White, C. L., Bravo, G., … Bayley, M. (2013). The YOU CALL–WE CALL Randomized Clinical Trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 6(6), 674–679. https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.113.000375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free