Transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated mitral bioprostheses: a systematic review

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Treatment of degenerated mitral bioprostheses with transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve (MVIV) implantation is increasingly used. The goal of this review was to evaluate the one-year outcomes of this therapy using the most recent evidence. Methods: A MEDLINE, Cochrane database and SCOPUS search was performed of published observational studies involving patients undergoing transcatheter MVIV for degenerated bioprosthesis to determine procedural success, thirty-day and one-year survival. Results: A total of 2,684 patients undergoing transcatheter MVIV were identified from five studies with mean age of 73-75 years, 57-63% female and Society for Thoracic Surgery (STS) risk score ranging from 9-13%. Procedural technical success ranged from 94-98%, with 1-3% rates of periprocedural death, 0-2% stroke and 1-5% risk of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. Thirty-day post-procedure mean mitral prosthetic gradient ranged from 6-7 mmHg and residual mitral regurgitation was mild or less in 96100% of patients. Thirty-day survival and one-year survival ranged from 93-97% and 83-89% respectively. Conclusions: Transcatheter MVIV is an effective treatment for structural degeneration of biologic mitral valve replacement with low complication rates and favorable one-year outcomes. Accordingly, MVIV should be considered as a reasonable alternative to re-do surgical mitral valve replacement in high risk patients with comorbidities. Further study of long-term outcomes of this treatment is needed.

Author supplied keywords

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eleid, M. F., Rihal, C. S., & Guerrero, M. E. (2021). Transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated mitral bioprostheses: a systematic review. Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 10(5), 558–563. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2021-tviv-10

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 3

60%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

20%

Engineering 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free