Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects

114Citations
Citations of this article
195Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Our understanding of the neural underpinnings of perception is largely built upon studies employing 2-dimensional (2D) planar images. Here we used slow event-related functional imaging in humans to examine whether neural populations show a characteristic repetition-related change in haemodynamic response for real-world 3-dimensional (3D) objects, an effect commonly observed using 2D images. As expected, trials involving 2D pictures of objects produced robust repetition effects within classic object-selective cortical regions along the ventral and dorsal visual processing streams. Surprisingly, however, repetition effects were weak, if not absent on trials involving the 3D objects. These results suggest that the neural mechanisms involved in processing real objects may therefore be distinct from those that arise when we encounter a 2D representation of the same items. These preliminary results suggest the need for further research with ecologically valid stimuli in other imaging designs to broaden our understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying human vision.

References Powered by Scopus

4772Citations
2636Readers
Get full text
2154Citations
1084Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Snow, J. C., Pettypiece, C. E., McAdam, T. D., McLean, A. D., Stroman, P. W., Goodale, M. A., & Culham, J. C. (2011). Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: Repetition effects for pictures versus real objects. Scientific Reports, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00130

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 74

55%

Researcher 39

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 16

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 86

65%

Neuroscience 29

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

9%

Engineering 6

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 15

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0