Using Abductive Research Logic to Construct a Rigorous Explanation of Amorphous Evaluation Findings

Abstract

Background: Two kinds of research logic prevail in scientific research: deductive research logic and inductive research logic. However, both fail in the field of evaluation, especially evaluation conducted in unfamiliar environments. Purpose: In this article I wish to suggest the application of a research logic—abduction—the logic of discovery—which is powerful and very effective in constructing and validating explanations of new phenomena (evaluation findings, in particular). Setting: The primary focus of the article is theoretic with a case example illustrating the practice of using the logic of discovery. Intervention: Not applicable.Research Design: Not applicable.Data Collection and Analysis: Not applicable.Findings: Not applicable.