Participation as relational investment: thinking beyond social capital in culturally and linguistically diverse educational contexts

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Departing from normative notions of participation as passive or responsive vis-à-vis active or agentic, this article conceptualises participation as ‘relational investment’. Drawing from a qualitative case study of a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) Australian primary classroom, I argue that students’ decisions about how to participate are shaped by the nature of their social relationships. Thus, I illuminate all participatory strategies as agentic and subject to the relational conditions of the field. Building on Bourdieu’s (1977, 1990, 1992) theorisations of ‘social capital’ and how this has been mobilised in Norton’s (1995) concept of ‘investment’ (used as a model for language learning), I illustrate the limits of the economic logic of capital embedded in these theoretical tools. Instead, I propose engaging with the notion of ‘sociality’ (Bottero’s 2009) to capture how the characteristics of classroom social relationships shape the ways students invest in participating.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cabiles, B. S. (2024). Participation as relational investment: thinking beyond social capital in culturally and linguistically diverse educational contexts. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 45(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2024.2305375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free